Who's Who
Key figures explained - quick reference guide
Reading time: ~2 minutes
Who’s Who: Key Figures
Quick Reference Guide
The Accused
Nuremberg Trials
Hermann Göring
- Highest-ranking Nazi tried
- Head of Luftwaffe (air force)
- Committed suicide before execution
Rudolf Hess
- Hitler’s deputy
- Life imprisonment
- Died in Spandau Prison (1987)
Albert Speer
- Minister of Armaments
- 20 years imprisonment
- Only defendant to express remorse
Karl Dönitz
- Head of German Navy
- 10 years imprisonment
- Briefly Hitler’s successor
Tokyo Trials
Hideki Tojo
- Prime Minister of Japan
- Executed (1948)
- Highest-ranking Japanese leader tried
General Yamashita
- Japanese general in Philippines
- Executed for command responsibility
- Established “Yamashita standard”
The Prosecutors
Telford Taylor
- Role: Chief prosecutor at Nuremberg
- Why Important: Wrote “Nuremberg and Vietnam” explaining how trials worked
- Chomsky’s Point: Taylor’s own explanation confirms selective standards
- Status: ✅ Verified - 7,049+ references found
Robert Jackson
- Role: US Chief Prosecutor at Nuremberg
- Why Important: Opening statement famous
- Quote: “We must never forget that the record on which we judge these defendants today is the record on which history will judge us tomorrow”
The Judges
Radhabinod Pal
- Role: Indian judge at Tokyo Trials
- Why Important: Only Asian judge, wrote 700-page dissent
- Chomsky’s Point: Pal compared atom bombs to Nazi crimes
- Status: 🔍 Not Found - dissent requires library access
- Background: International law expert, criticized trials
Other Judges
- Nuremberg: 4 judges (US, UK, France, USSR)
- Tokyo: 11 judges from Allied nations
- Note: All from victorious nations
The Analysts
Noam Chomsky
- Who: MIT linguist and political commentator
- Why Relevant: Wrote essay analyzing trials
- Background: Critic of US foreign policy, academic
- Essay: “If the Nuremberg Laws were Applied…” (1990)
Why These People Matter
For Understanding Trials
- Prosecutors: Showed how trials were conducted
- Judges: Made decisions about what was a crime
- Defendants: What they were accused of
For Understanding Chomsky
- Telford Taylor: Confirms Chomsky’s points
- Pal: Supports critique of selective standards
- Yamashita: Example of command responsibility
For Understanding Analysis
- Chomsky: Made the claims we’re verifying
- Sources: People he references (Taylor, Pal)
- Context: Who was involved and why it matters
This guide helps readers understand who the key players are and why they matter for understanding Chomsky’s analysis.